Former cheerleader trial goes to jury

Share This Story



A jury's decision in a former Cincinnati Bengals' cheerleader's defamation lawsuit against a gossip website could impact websites around the country, attorneys for both sides said Wednesday.


We're not just watching the field on Sunday. NFL cheerleaders provide the perfect sideshow.

Sarah Jones is seeking damages from and its operator over posts made in 2009 on the Scottsdale, Ariz. - based website. One post claimed she had sex with every Bengals player, and the other said she probably had two sexually transmitted diseases. She says both are false and has accused website operator Nik Richie of malice.

Jones' attorney, Eric Deters, told jurors in closing arguments Wednesday they have a chance to send a message to websites across the country that they should be careful and ''it's not right to defame people.''

He said Richie is guilty of malice by posting submissions Richie says were anonymous. Even though Richie eventually took the posts down months later, they will never be off the Internet, Deters said.

''He can bash her forever,'' Deters said.

Richie's attorney told jurors their decision could have a negative impact on free speech for other people and websites.

''It's trying to hold Nik responsible for someone else's work,'' attorney David Gingras said.

The posts were unrelated to the former high school teacher's guilty plea last year to having sex with an underage ex-student. Gingras told jurors that lies Jones acknowledged she told involving her relationship with the teen were relevant to her credibility.

Check out our latest Facebook updates, tweets and photos.

Deters said Richie is the one on trial and jurors shouldn't consider Jones' actions related to the criminal case

Jones was allowed to avoid jail time with her plea, but was forbidden from teaching again. Jones, 28, still has a relationship with the now 18-year-old former student, and they have said they plan to marry.

Jones must prove the posts were substantially false and that Richie knew the comments were false when they were posted or had serious doubts about their truthfulness.

Gingras said his client could not know whether the posts were true or false when he posted them.

Jurors may also award damages to Jones if they find in her favor.

Gingras said Jones did not suffer financial loss or medical problems from the posts and asked that the jury award a nominal amount of $1 if they find for her.

Deters said they are not seeking a specific amount but said Jones suffered mental anguish.

''Deliver justice to him,'' Deters said, pointing to Richie. ''Deliver mercy to her.''

A January trial in the lawsuit resulted in a hung jury.

Related Stories

Member Comments

Please note by clicking on "Post comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be Polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.

powered by

More Than Sports on MSN