Does Big Dance still have a big problem?
![foxsports](https://b.fssta.com/uploads/application/misc/byline-generic-headshot.vresize.36.36.medium.0.png)
![](https://a57.foxsports.com/statics.foxsports.com/www.foxsports.com/content/uploads/2020/02/640/427/d828bff9-pi-cbk-arizona-tj-mcconnell-rondae-hollis-jefferson-gabe-york-031215.jpg?ve=1&tl=1, https://a57.foxsports.com/statics.foxsports.com/www.foxsports.com/content/uploads/2020/02/1280/854/d828bff9-pi-cbk-arizona-tj-mcconnell-rondae-hollis-jefferson-gabe-york-031215.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 2x)
The NCAA recently made some subtle changes to the First Four. And while many have voices their approval of the amendments, SB Nation still sees a major problem in the system that has to do with unfairly stacked regions. Here is an excerpt from the piece:
"Two seasons ago, Wichita State became the first team since 1991 to enter the NCAA Tournament with an unblemished record, and was rightfully rewarded with a No. 1 seed. The committee's rankings of all 68 teams later revealed that the Shockers were regarded as the No. 3 overall team in the tournament, meaning they should have been assigned a region with the second-strongest No. 2 and No. 4 seeds, and the third-strongest No. 3 seed. Instead, Gregg Marshall's team was dealt the remarkably unfair hand of being in the same region as the tournament's best No. 3 and No. 4 seeds (Michigan and Louisville), and its second-best No. 2 seed (Duke). Toss in preseason No. 1 (and eventual national runner-up) Kentucky as a remarkably under-seeded No. 8, and you have one of the most unfairly stacked regions in the history of the NCAA Tournament."
(h/t SB Nation)
![Creighton Bluejays](https://b.fssta.com/uploads/application/college/team-logos/Creighton.vresize.160.160.medium.0.png)