10 things to look for in the Final Four

10 things to look for in the Final Four

Published Apr. 3, 2015 8:14 p.m. ET

By The Student Section Staff

The Final Four features three of the top four Ken Pom teams for the first time since 2012. In the human polls, Kentucky was number 1 the entire season, Duke never left the top 5 and Wisconsin slipped as low as 7th. Michigan State is 15th on Ken Pom. The Spartans were ranked for five weeks this season as well. It’s not like Michigan State is a slouch. On paper, this is one of the more loaded Final Fours in recent memory. There are story lines galore. Let’s take a look at ten things to look for in the 2015 Final Four.

Offensive Rebounding

ADVERTISEMENT

Obviously offensive rebounding is something that is of importance every game, it is one of the four factors after all. Both Kentucky and Duke, the heavily favored squads, are both a little soft on the defensive glass. Neither of their Big 10 opponents are great offensive rebounding teams however. Michigan State is above average but nothing special.

Wisconsin is almost at the national average. Kentucky has had struggles keeping teams off the glass during the tournament. It didn’t matter much against Cincinnati, but it certainly mattered a whole lot when a weak offensive rebounding team in Notre Dame pulled down over 40% on the offensive glass.

To flip things around, the teams in blue feast on offensive rebounds. Kentucky is 6th in offensive rebound percentage, Duke is 23rd. Wisconsin is incredibly stout at keeping teams off the offensive glass. The Badgers give up less than 24% on the boards, the 4th lowest mark. Michigan State comes in at a solid 33rd.

The difference makers on the glass are Jahlil Okafor and Amile Jefferson for Duke. Okafor is one of the best offensive rebounders in the entire nation, hauling in nearly 15% of Duke’s misses. Jefferson is in the top 30 of rebound percentage at nearly 14%. Michigan State has a couple of solid defensive rebounders in Matt Costello and Denzel Valentine, but the start is Branden Dawson, who pulls nearly 24% on the defensive glass.

Kentucky has a couple of great offensive rebounders in Trey Lyles, Willie Cauley-Stein and especially Karl-Anthony Towns. Towns is right around Jefferson’s 14% on the glass. The Kentucky bench players like Dakari Johnson and Marcus Lee hit the glass extremely hard. Wisconsin is powered by Frank Kaminsky. Frank the Tank dominates the defensive glass.

Wisconsin’s Three Point Shooting

The biggest story of Wisconsin’s win over Arizona was the fantastic three point shooting. The Badgers were roughly 100 of 100 during the second half to put the Wildcats to rest. The Wildcats from Kentucky offer a different challenge. They don’t give up a ton of looks from three. If they do, those looks are contested. Wisconsin’s shooters are great. Sam Dekker played like a lottery pick. While Wisconsin isn’t solely dependent on threes in their offense, the three point shot could be what takes down Kentucky.

Duke’s Three Point Defense

During the NCAA tournament, Duke’s opponents have shot 6-19, 31.6% / 2-13, 15.4% / 4-16, 25% / 2-10, 20% from three. That’s a pretty low percentage. Some of it can be attributed to Houston and the poor shooting there all weekend. A larger part could be attributed to the Duke defense. Opponents have hit just 31.2% from deep against the Blue Devils.

Travis Trice

Michigan State has thrived on the three point shot. The Spartans have hit 9 in each of their last two games and splashed down 6 of 12 against Virginia. Travis Trice has been the huge reason behind that. He’s hit 11 of 29 from distance over the last three games. A poor shooting game against Louisville hampered that a bit. He was the only Spartan who seemed to miss from deep against the Cardinals though.

The senior is averaging 19.7 points during the tournament. He’s missed all of two free throws, none in the two games in Syracuse. Trice has dished out 16 assists to 8 turnovers, a solid 2:1 ratio. If Michigan State is going to topple Duke, it needs a big day from Trice.

Who guard Jahlil Okafor?

The focal point of the Michigan State defensive gameplan is what they do to slow down Okafor. Sparty couldn’t slow down Montrezl Harrell of Louisville, who missed a lot of shots he normally makes in the second half of the Elite 8 contest. The size issue is huge for Michigan State but so is the talent level. They don’t have anyone who can matchup with the potential first pick. I suspect we’ll see a lot of double teams and some junk defenses to throw Duke off. Of course that opens up the court for the rest of the Blue Devils and their sharp shooters.

Can Wisconsin get enough stops?

Wisconsin’s defense has been pretty awful during the tournament. Three of the six worst games in terms of points per possession have been during the tournament. The two best teams Wisconsin has played this season are Duke and Arizona. They handled the Badger defense to ridiculous degrees. I don’t think it’s too much to ask if the Badger defense can slow down what is one of the best offenses in the nation.

Can Kentucky get to the line?

One of the strengths of the Kentucky offense is their relentless ability to get to the free throw line. The Wildcats have one of the best free throw rates in the nation and shoot free throws very well. We saw Wisconsin put Arizona at the line 30 times in what was a brutally called game. Normally the Badgers rarely foul. There is going to be some big give and take here. If the Cats can do what Arizona did and get Hayes and Kaminsky (to a certain extent) in foul trouble, that makes the interior defense a little bit softer and allows Towns especially room to dominate.

Justise Winslow’s Domination

Justise Winslow was Duke’s best player in Houston. Utah and Gonzaga weren’t defensive slouches, neither had an answer for him. Winslow can hit from deep if you give him space. Off the dribble he can finish and draw fouls. He’s flashed the ability to offensive rebound well. He can be a solid passer.

The other thing is that Winslow has a great knack for getting steals and blocks. He’s a two way player who is an accent to a superstar. There have been some comparisons to Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, but his closest comp on Ken Pom is Bradley Beal. To be fair, Beal did not shoot the long ball well in college. Winslow is the separator from Duke being good and Duke being great.

Kentucky’s Guard Play

We know that Kentucky is going to get production from it’s big men. Karl-Anthony Towns will be solid. Cauley-Stein will contribute. Trey Lyles will be my favorite Wildcat on the floor because of all the various things he does and does well. The question is what will Kentucky get from their guards? Devin Booker has appeared to break out of his shooting slump at the perfect time. Tyler Ulis has been great in the tournament, but there was the major issue of 5 turnovers in the game against Notre Dame. Aaron Harrison has been a bit up and down, although he still nailed the big shot against Notre Dame because of course he did. Andrew Harrison has primarily lived at the free throw line to get his points. In fact, Harrison is 21-25 at the free throw line and 8-22 from the floor.

Michigan State at the foul line

If their game against Duke is close, one has to wonder if the Spartans can ice it out or stay in the game at the stripe. They do not shoot free throws well. As a team, they are hitting 63.2%. That’s one of the 13 worst marks in the country. Trice, Denzel Valentine and Bryn Forbes are the only above average foul shooters. Dawson is under 50%, so is Gavin Schilling. One wonders if Duke goes into Hack-a-Sparty mode if it’s close.

 

More from The Student Section:

    share