For Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger, the Swiss referee ''killed'' the match. The language was inflammatory but the sentiment was spot-on.
No ifs or buts, Massimo Busacca ruined one of the most hotly anticipated games of 2011 when he reached for a red card and sent off Robin van Persie in the Champions League on Tuesday night.
''A total joke,'' the Arsenal striker said of Busacca's lapse of reason. But, really, there is nothing funny about the corrosive damage that such ludicrously poor refereeing decisions have on the enjoyment and credibility of football.
Those of us who think that the sport's rule-makers are wise to resist pressure for video replays to help referees, who believe that part of football's charm is that decisions are left in human hands and made by officials on the pitch, always feel sheepish, naive and deflated when experienced and supposedly astute people like Busacca get basics wrong.
Contested decisions are so frequent in football that the sport seems to live on a razor's edge of never-ending crisis involving referees.
But that suits the suits who govern the game. They thrive off the controversies and debates that keep fans talking. Outrage that Mark Clattenburg did not send off Wayne Rooney for elbowing. Anger that Martin Atkinson was soft on Chelsea defender David Luiz's cynical fouls. Fury against France's Thierry Henry for his cheating hand ball against Ireland that Swedish referee Martin Hansson failed to spot. Venom from Wenger for Busacca's petty by-the-book expulsion of Van Persie.
The perceived injustices in every match help make football a sport of passion and strangely masochistic entertainment. Bad officiating hurts but we always come back for more. How gullible we are. But how sad that referees so often overshadow the skills that players show on the pitch. The focus of Barcelona's 3-1 win over Arsenal should, again, be the artistry of the world's best team, not of a referee's folly.
If video replays did offer real-time help for officials, they would not have made a jot of difference in the case of Van Persie. Deciding whether to send off the Dutchman because he played on after the referee blew his whistle was always going to be a judgment call, which no machine could handle.
Van Persie collected a pass from his captain, Cesc Fabregas. The linesman raised his flag for offside. Busacca blew his whistle. Van Persie either did not hear or ignored it. He took a step and shot waywardly past Barcelona 'keeper Victor Valdes.
Hardly the crime of the century. Yet Busacca ruled that Van Persie deliberately wasted time. With no hesitation, he flashed a yellow card. It was the striker's second of the night. Off he went.
And the match died. With just 10 men against Barcelona's 12 (11 players plus Busacca), resistance became futile for Arsenal.
Busacca could have been smart like Howard Webb at the 2010 World Cup final. Webb refrained from giving a red card to Nigel de Jong after just 28 minutes of play, even though the Dutch midfielder's karate kick on Xabi Alonso warranted it. Proving that even good refereeing cannot satisfy everyone, Webb was subsequently criticized by some for his leniency but congratulated by others for not ruining the showpiece match with an early expulsion. He tried to ensure that the outcome of the game would be decided by the players, not by his decisions - which is what Busacca should have done in Barcelona-Arsenal.
Webb, incidentally, also had a rough time on Tuesday night, in refereeing Shakhtar Donetsk vs. AS Roma. He missed the vicious elbow that Roma captain Daniele De Rossi swung into the jaw of Shakhtar captain Darijo Srna. Making things worse, Webb then showed the protesting Srna a yellow card. Ouch.
Van Persie pleaded with Busacca that the barrage of sound from the 95,000-plus Nou Camp crowd drowned out his whistle. Of course, Van Persie would say that. Few players own up honestly to their mistakes, which doesn't make the referees' job easier. But Van Persie might have been telling the truth. Busacca could have given him the benefit of doubt. At most, Van Persie squandered no more than a few seconds. Sending off a player for such a misdemeanor in such an important game may be within the rules of football but is hardly within the spirit.
''It killed a promising, fantastic football match ... Frankly, it's embarrassing when you love the game,'' said Wenger.
Many will assume that Barcelona would have won regardless. They will point to the game stats that were overwhelmingly lopsided toward Barcelona, with 10 shots on goal to zero from Arsenal. They will argue that the genius of Lionel Messi, the pinball passing of Xavi and Andres Iniesta, and the entire team's relentless industry made Barcelona a worthy winner. They may even be right.
Or, with Van Persie still on the field, Arsenal might have held back the Barcelona tide. Unlikely, perhaps, but not impossible.
Because of Busacca, we'll never know.
---
John Leicester is an international sports columnist for The Associated Press. Write to him at jleicester(at)ap.
