Is Adam Rose Returning to WWE?
Adam Rose may have teased on Twitter that he’s going to return to WWE.
Earlier this year, Adam Rose faced a bit of controversy. He got suspended 60 days by WWE for his second violation of the company’s Wellness Policy. Weeks later, Rose got arrested on domestic violence charges for an incident with his wife, which ended up being dropped. This led to WWE suspending him indefinitely and eventually parting ways with the veteran wrestler.
Since then, Rose has worked on the independent scene as Aldo Rose with an identical gimmick. He has appeared in events in the United States and soon will in the United Kingdom.
Could WWE be bringing back the former Leo Kruger, though?
On Wednesday, Rose posted this somewhat cryptic tweet on his Twitter account. He captioned it with “Something big is coming! This party is gonna blow the roof off!” The most interest part may have been the hashtags, though, of “#YouCantHangWithAdam”, “#AdamRose”, and “WWE”.
Something big is coming! This party is gonna blow the roof off! #YouCantHangWithAdam #AdamRose #WWE pic.twitter.com/VMZGOIMhLJ
— Aldo Rose (@Aegis_Rose) October 20, 2016
This doesn’t confirm that Rose is returning to WWE, but this tweet gives every indication that it’s a possibility. The “Adam Rose” name is owned by WWE, meaning he can’t use it on the independent scene. Why else might he be talking about his company gimmick then?
Rose had last been seen on WWE as part of the Social Outcasts stable with Curtis Axel, Bo Dallas, and Heath Slater. The group has since split up, though. Slater moved on to SmackDown and is one-half of the brand’s tag team champions with Rhyno. Dallas has taken on a darker gimmick that sees him carry around a sign on Raw. He’s set to go into a feud with Axel.
Where Adam Rose would fit on the WWE roster would be interesting. Multiple stars from the past have been brought back to take up spots, so is there a place for him on the roster? Is there any need to have someone with a domestic violence history return?
More from Daily DDT
This article originally appeared on