Winners, losers from US' January camp

Winners, losers from US' January camp

Published Jan. 26, 2012 12:00 a.m. ET

Two games, two wins and two shutouts. That simple summary of the US national team’s first action of 2012 would suggest a very successful start to the new year, but while victories are always a good thing, that alone isn’t going to hide the fact the national team hardly set the world on fire against Venezuela and Panama.

The January friendlies were never supposed to be about results; at least, not as the most important aspect of playing these games. The significance of the matches was testing a crop of national team newcomers and retreads to see which, if any, were ready to graduate to the full senior squad. It was a hunting expedition for national team depth more than a quest to help Jurgen Klinsmann improve his disappointing won-loss record, though that clearly isn’t a bad added benefit.

On Wednesday, the United States won and did so on the road against a tough Panama side, even after going a man down. Those factors should make the win even more impressive, and they do, but none of that changes the fact that Panama out played the United States for 90 minutes, and outplayed the Americans before the suspect red card issued to Geoff Cameron.

The reality of Wednesday’s match was that far more US players laid eggs than didn’t. That disappointing fact doesn’t make Wednesday’s match useless, though. Klinsmann still came away learning plenty about the players he was evaluating. Some players stepped up, some definitely did not.

ADVERTISEMENT

After the match, Klinsmann wasn’t ready to single out any players for praise or criticism. He kept things about as vague and positive as we’ve come to expect from him.

“I don’t think it would be right at this point to name players,” Klinsmann said. “We had a very good look at all of them. Everyone came in from a different background and a different environment. What we did in these last three weeks was get a really good picture.”

It’s tough to be too hard on Klinsmann for his team’s underwhelming showings. The reality is this squad was a patchwork group of players, most of which hadn’t had much, if any, national team experience. Perhaps it was a bit unrealistic to expect this team to come together and play beautiful soccer.

That said, there is no denying that some players took advantage of the opportunities and excelled while others stumbled. Ultimately that was the point of these games, at least just as important as whether the makeshift squad was able to get results.

So what did we actually learn from the recent USA friendlies? Here are some players who impressed:

JERMAINE JONES

Yes, he had his share of turnovers, which critics seem intent on focusing on, but the fact is he was dominant in both games and was the clear-cut leader of this group. He is good enough to play for the full senior team and had to impress Klinsmann enough in these games to earn more minutes down the road. The battle for minutes in central midfield is tough, but Jones provided a reminder that he still merits consideration.

GEOFF CAMERON

It might be surprising to see him on here considering the red card he earned against Panama, but the fact is he had an outstanding first game and was holding his own against Panama before Blas Perez ran onto a long pass and forced him into a play that was ruled a red card foul rather than a fair challenge. Cameron still impressed Klinsmann and stands a very good chance of more call-ups in 2012.

HEATH PEARCE

One of the few players who rebounded from a tough outing against Venezuela with a better showing against Panama (actually, the only player). Pearce came into this camp as a player to watch because he was considered a viable left back option for the full senior team. Against Panama, he came on just before halftime and helped shut down his side of the field, which Panama had been abusing before his inclusion. Will that be enough to earn a call up next month in Italy? It just might.

CHRIS WONDOLOWSKI

No, he didn’t score, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that he does a great job of creating chances for himself, even when the midfield isn’t providing him with much service. He isn’t a player likely to worry top teams like Italy or Brazil, but Wondolowski could certainly be a serviceable option against CONCACAF rivals in the next round of qualifying. He showed that much in the recent friendlies.

C.J. SAPONG

While he didn’t get many minutes or get any real scoring chances, what Sapong did is show off a confident and physical presence up top. There aren’t a ton of forwards in the national team pool with his strength and athleticism. Expecting him to get a call-up with the full squad soon is probably a stretch, but he showed enough for Klinsmann to keep an eye on as the MLS season approaches.

NICK RIMANDO

It’s easy to write off Rimando because of his age and lack of size, but the simple fact is he’s one of the best goalkeepers in MLS. Against Panama, he was absolutely stellar. Does that mean he has a legitimate chance of becoming Tim Howard’s back-up? Perhaps not, but he definitely gave Klinsmann something to think about the next time he’s putting a roster together.

Here are players who saw their stock take a dip:

TEAL BUNBURY

Given a golden opportunity to start two games and boost his stock, Bunbury was largely invisible. When seen, he showed a flawed game. Whether he was still rusty from the off-season or just not ready for prime time, Bunbury didn’t do much to suggest he merits another senior team look any time soon. You can point to the team around him and say he didn’t have much support, but Chris Wondolowski had the same teammates and created significantly more chances for himself.

BREK SHEA

The only player to play in every game Klinsmann has coached for the United States had two thoroughly underwhelming showings and had little connection with the team around him. He is still a lock to be on the full squad, and should do better with more talent around him, but if he is hoping to become a lock-down start on the full team he really didn’t offer much of a case this past week.

ZACH LOYD

In fairness to Loyd, he’s still young and inexperienced, but there is no denying he was completely overwhelmed against Panama. That shouldn’t erase the fact that he looked good as a sub against Venezuela or the fact his pass set up Graham Zusi’s game-winning goal. The reality is he’s just not ready for primetime. He’s 24, fast, athletic and versatile.

A.J. DELAGARZA

A promising debut against Venezuela got DeLaGarza off on the right foot, but Panama thoroughly exposed him for what he is: a center back who just isn’t close to being an international full back. It isn’t his fault he doesn’t have much experience at right back, and just isn’t really suited to the position, but it’s clear that is where Klinsmann saw him fitting best, which doesn’t bode well for him being called in again anytime soon.

MICHAEL PARKHURST

It might seem unfair to list him here because he was stellar against Venezuela, but the Panama game exposed flaws in his game that were a concern almost three years ago during his first go-round with the national team. He’s a smart player, and is good with the ball, but against international level strikers he gets found out and abused. There’s no shame in praising the good aspects of his game, but there’s also no shame in saying that he just isn’t likely to be a viable center back option for the full national team.

share