Fergie: My choice not to splash cash

Fergie: My choice not to splash cash

Published Jan. 9, 2010 12:40 a.m. ET

With talk of a £600million bond issue being launched to part repay the colossal loans taken out by the Glazer family to complete their controversial takeover of the Old Trafford outfit going unchecked, it has been widely assumed United are in a period of financial strife. Of major concern are the £175million worth of payment-in-kind notes that are currently attracting 14.25% interest, which are partly responsible for the overall debt mountain of £790million and urgently need to be refinanced to lower overall outgoings. Given such a backdrop, it is hardly a surprise the Glazer family are being held responsible for the fact Ferguson has so far spent only £20million of the world record £80million fee received from Real Madrid last summer for Cristiano Ronaldo. Yet the United boss is adamant such conclusions are unfair. "I don't have any concerns about the financial situation," he said. "There is absolutely no issue at all. I am really confident about that. "Concerns of the supporters are down to the fact that I haven't moved in the transfer market. But that is nothing to do with the Glazers or with David Gill. "It is simply because I am not going to pay £50million for a striker who is not worth it." While Ferguson could easily be accused of toeing the party line, he does actually feel the idea of a bond issue is sound. His reasoning for doing so goes against the oft-repeated claim from the Glazers that debt is not in itself a bad thing. "There has been talk about a bond issue and I think that's a good thing for the club. Anything that helps with the repayment of the debt is a good thing," he said. "There is debt there but it has never interrupted my plans for the team - at any stage." The statement is unlikely to receive a favourable response from the vociferous anti-Glazer faction, who are currently looking on in a degree of envy at the huge amounts of money being spent by Manchester City's Abu Dhabi-based owner Sheikh Mansour, who is apparently willing to cover any cost to achieve his own Premier League ambitions. Yet, as Ferguson accepts, at the back of his mind is the knowledge that stalwarts such as Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes and Gary Neville cannot go on forever, even if it sometimes appears that is the case. "That is possible," replied Ferguson, when asked whether he would have to spend to replace aging players. "But it could be possible at any time. But I don't see it as an issue. "For starters, we have plenty of cover, especially in midfield. We have Rafael da Silva, an excellent prospect, at right-back and we have another youngster in Ritchie de Laet. "In addition, Ryan Giggs has been unbelievable. I think he can still play for another two seasons. There isn't an imminent threat to the squad." Of more obvious concern is the need for extra firepower. If there is a problem at United just now, it is not so much the loss of Ronaldo, as influential as he had been in three successive Premier League title campaigns. What the Red Devils do not have at present is someone to share the workload with Wayne Rooney, as the England man used to do with Ronaldo. Neither Dimitar Berbatov nor Michael Owen have been a consistent threat and the number of times Ferguson mentioned the word "striker" suggests he would get one if he could. Yet Karim Benzema remains out of reach after he joined Real Madrid in the summer, even though United were prepared to pay £30million to sign him from Lyon. The others are too expensive, at a time of year Ferguson knows is fraught with difficulty. "It's true that we don't have great options if Rooney were to get injured, in the sense that we don't have top quality like Ronaldo, who could play anywhere," Ferguson said. "But I can't see any real diamonds. I just don't see that player who can make a difference for us in terms of value or ability."

ADVERTISEMENT
share