NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, left, looks down as St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke talks to the media after team owners voted Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2016, in Houston to allow the Rams to move to a new stadium just outside Los Angeles, and the San Diego Chargers will have an option to share the facility. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)
ST. LOUIS (AP) Rams owner Stan Kroenke and others violated Missouri law by lying about their desire to keep the NFL team in St. Louis, according to a lawsuit filed by fans that seeks class-action status and unspecified damages.
The suit was filed Wednesday in St. Louis Circuit Court, one day after NFL owners voted to allow the Rams to relocate to suburban Los Angeles for next season.
The suit alleges that Kroenke and chief operating officer Kevin Demoff made false and misleading statements over the years indicating the team had no intention of leaving St. Louis, violating Missouri's Merchandising Practices Act. The law prohibits false statements in the sale or advertisement of trade or commerce. The suit claims the Rams violated the law in connection with the sale of tickets and merchandise.
Article continues below ...
Messages seeking comment from the Rams were not returned.
The suit was filed by James Pudlowski, Louis Cross III, Gain Henry and Steve Henry, and was the first lawsuit stemming from the Rams' departure. Among the statements cited in the lawsuit:
– Demoff was asked after Kroenke's purchase of land in Inglewood, California, about the Rams' future and said, ''I expect it will be right here in St. Louis.'' The Inglewood site is where Kroenke plans a $1.86 billion stadium expected to open in 2019.
– Kroenke said in a 2010 interview, ''It's not our desire to ever lead the charge out of St. Louis. … I'm going to attempt to do everything I can to keep the Rams in St. Louis.''
''Defendants did in fact `lead the charge' out of St. Louis, yet defendants never informed their ticket and merchandise buyers or corrected the previous statements,'' the lawsuit says.
The St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, which spent more than $16 million on plans for a new riverfront stadium that the NFL eventually deemed unacceptable, could also sue. The co-chairmen of the task force that led that effort declined to speculate on the possibility of legal action.