Ex-driver loses suit to force return of car
A former race car driver has lost his lawsuit to force the
return of a car displayed at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Hall
of Fame Museum.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago said Tuesday
that the museum doesn’t have to give the Porsche 935 K3 back to
Reginald “Don” Whittington.
“We’re thrilled that we won the case and that the car will be
able to remain in our collection for all the visitors to see,”
said museum Director Ellen Bireley.
Whittington’s attorney expressed dismay.
“We would have liked for it to have turned out differently, but
that’s the way things go sometimes,” lawyer Bill O’Connor said
The Associated Press left a message seeking comment at
Whittington, a five-time Indianapolis 500 starter who also raced
vintage P-51 Mustang World War II aircraft, won the grueling 24
Hours of Le Mans in the car along with his brother Bill and Klaus
Ludwig in 1979. In the early 1980s, he either gave or loaned the
car to the museum in a handshake deal, court records said.
Everything was quiet until 2004, when Whittington, who runs an
aircraft leasing and sales operation in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.,
asked the museum to return the car for a vintage Porsche event. The
museum said no.
Whittington said the car was a loan. The museum said it was a
“In essence, the only details about the transfer on which the
parties can agree is that no records of the transfer exist and that
the transaction was a ‘handshake’ deal,” the judges wrote.
But the sides differed on who made the deal and when it was
made, as well as what the deal was.
Whittington said he had maintained ownership of the car through
a company he owned with his brother until it was dissolved shortly
before he was sentenced to 18 months in prison in the late 1980s
following his conviction on charges related to marijuana smuggling.
He said he listed the car as a personal asset on paperwork he filed
with the government before going to prison.
But Bireley testified the car was listed as donated in documents
on file at the museum, and court records said it wasn’t listed as a
gift on tax forms.
Whittington’s initial complaint listed the car’s value as more
Without clear records of the deal, the appellate court upheld
the lower court’s decision holding that Whittington’s behavior
after the transaction “was more consistent with the car being a
gift rather than a loan.”
“The lesson for Whittington should be that an unwritten
contract isn’t worth the paper it isn’t written on,” the judges