MLB: About Those Mike Trout and Mickey Mantle Comparisons
Just how close are the comparisons made between Mike Trout and MLB Hall of Famer Mickey Mantle?
Do you think you’d be able to recognize greatness the first time you saw it? Walt Burrows apparently thought he could. In June of 2011 he was watching a baseball game while working as the Canadian director for the Major League Scouting Bureau. Burrows received a phone call, and the person on the other line asked him how the game was going.
At that moment in time Burrows had no idea just how right he would be. Those words were spoken about Mike Trout. This week Trout won his second AL MVP award in just his sixth MLB season. Since making his debut in 2011, Trout has measured up well in comparison to some of the games greatest players.
Walt Burrows wouldn’t be surprised to know that one of the closest comparisons you can find to Trout’s first six seasons is in fact Mickey Mantle.
Just how well do these two players compare through their first six years?
Strictly from a numbers perspective it’s incredible how close they are to each other in a number of categories. In Mantle’s first six seasons he hit .308/.412/.560 with a .972 OPS and 166 OPS+. He added to those totals 173 HR, 575 RBI, 43 SB, and 524 BB.
Trout on the other hand has hit .306/.405/.557 with a .963 OPS and 170 OPS+. He’s also accumulated 168 HR, 497 RBI, 143 SB, and 477 BB. .
That’s not to say there aren’t a few differences. Trout has clearly had more success stealing bases. Mantle’s highest SB total in his career was 21. Trout has already cleared that total three times in his first six seasons. In years 7-11 Mantle did start to swipe more bags, but never the quantity of Trout’s early seasons.
On the other hand Mantle had accumulated 400+ more RBI and runs at this point in his career. A couple of reasons can be offered for this difference. First, Mantle was a part of a more successful lineup than Trout currently finds himself in. Aside from HR, the ’51-’56 Yankees had more success in just about every offensive category than the modern LA Angels. Mantle reaped the benefits of having a better group around him.
More from Call to the Pen
- New York Yankees 2016 Player of the Year: Masahiro Tanaka5h ago
- Cleveland Indians 2016 Player of the Year: Corey Kluber6h ago
- Miami Marlins: Kenley Jansen Is Team’s Top Target7h ago
- MLB Considering New Rules on Roster Size, September Call-Ups8h ago
- Tampa Bay Rays 2016 Player of the Year: Kevin Kiermaier9h ago
Not only was Mantle’s lineup better, but his position in the lineup was more conducive to counting stats. Over the course of his career the lifelong Yankee primarily hit from the third spot in the order. Trout has had to rack up statistics largely hitting from the second or first spot in the lineup. It might not have made a huge difference, but Trout likely would have at least higher RBI totals with a move down the order.
If you look at the entirety of each player’s value over their first six seasons you can draw even more connections. Following the 1956 season, Mantle had accumulated 41fWAR over six years. With the conclusion of this season Trout now has 47.7 fWAR to start his career. While Trout has had more value by fWAR up to this point, there’s the possibility that might not hold for long. In ’56 and ’57 Mantle ran off back-to-back seasons in which he tallied 11.5 and 11.4 fWAR. Trout should be able to hang on to the lead, but it will still take a big season to keep a comfortable cushion.
There’s no reason to believe Mike Trout won’t continue to be one of the best players in baseball. As the years go on he will likely draw plenty of comparisons to some of the game’s greatest players. Regardless of whether or not you agree with the comparisons, we should all be able to agree that we’re watching a special player.