Are doping programs just for show?

Lance Armstrong
Lance Armstrong got caught. A study suggests most drug cheats get away with it.
Share This Story


ADELAIDE, Australia (AP)

Australian researchers say current controls on drug use in sports are doomed to fail and performed largely for show.


These athletes flouted the rules. Who's in this hall of shame?

The University of Adelaide study — titled "Anti-doping systems in sports are doomed to fail: a probability and cost analysis" — examining worldwide data of positive doping tests from 93 sports, found that single, random drug tests caught cheats only 2.9 percent of the time. For a 100 percent rate, all athletes would need to be tested up to 50 times a year.

"The current system of anti-doping testing is inadequate to eliminate doping," study co-author professor Maciej Henneberg said in a statement Friday. "It appears that anti-doping policies are in place more for perception, to show that the right thing is being done. In practice . . . the anti-doping system is doomed to fail."

Henneberg said if athletes were tested 12 times a year, their odds of being caught was only 33 percent, assuming they were continuously using a banned substance.

"But we know that athletes don't continuously use performance enhancing drugs, they have increasingly sophisticated techniques to avoid detection," Henneberg said.

Doping regimes vary between different sports and events. The Tour de France conducted 9,296 tests in 2012 for an average of nearly 10 tests for blood and urine on each of the 952 riders. The International Tennis Federation conducted 2,185 tests in 2012 on a total of 632 players, an average of 3.5 tests per player.

Related Stories

Member Comments

Please note by clicking on "Post comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be Polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator.

powered by

Fox Sports Store