Email A Friend
(separate multiple email addresses with a semi-colon)
Email A Friend
Your email has been sent.
Profile & Email Settings
Account Info & Linking
Profile & Email Settings
Account Info & Linking
FOX Sports Exclusive
JUDGE: Comparing the Bay Area's finest
Share This Story
Updated Jun 2, 2014 1:48 PM ET
are the best team in the AFC. The San Francisco
are one of the best teams in the NFC. The two are separated by the San Francisco Bay, but it's not water or a pro football conference that keeps them apart.
It's talent. Both of them have it; only Oakland has more. At least that's the judgment of NFL scouts and personnel directors asked to compare the two clubs, position-by-position. The results were conclusive and unanimous, and I'm afraid that even
couldn't dig the
out of this hole. With the exception of running back and the defensive line, the
came out ahead everywhere with the most decisive advantages in the offensive line and secondary and I guess that shouldn't come as a surprise. Oakland had four players on this year's All-Pro team. My only question is this: If Oakland's talent is so superior how did the
lose to San Francisco ... at home no less ... when the two met in early November? I guess that's a subject for our next debate. For now, here's how NFL talent scouts divide the Bay Area's playoff teams.
was the league MVP, with a career-high 4,689 yards passing including an NFL-record 10 300-yard games. Since joining the
in 1994 the guy's been remarkably consistent, throwing for 105 touchdowns and 44 interceptions. Garcia, on the other hand, was all over the place this year, throwing 11 fewer touchdowns than last season and for 934 fewer yards than in 2000. His completion percentage was down. His yards per attempt were down. And his overall passer rating was down. Still, it was Garcia who pulled off a 24-point comeback last week, earning him NFC Offensive Player of the Week accolades. "I'll take Gannon," said one scout. "He's more consistent, and that's the important thing here." "I like Gannon's overall game management," said an AFC pro personnel director. "The guy's experienced, and he doesn't make mistakes that kill you."
The Verdict: Gannon
have one of the league's most underrated running backs in
have the league's most underrated fullback in
. But the difference maker here is neither of those guys; it's the
, who's superior to Oakland's No. 2 back,
, and who gives San Francisco a solid one-two punch with
were sixth in rushing. The
were 18th. Garner had 11 touchdowns and averaged 5.3 yards a carry. Hearst and Barlow had 14 touchdowns and combined for 1,647 yards. "Hearst and Barlow are a wash," said one scout. "But Barlow's better than Wheatley, and I'd much rather have Beasley than
. Plus, the
, as a whole, catch the ball better out of the backfield than the
There's not a more dominant receiver in the game than
, and skeptics can consult the
. So Owens had 43 fewer catches than
. He had three more scores and one more signature moment. But we're not talking about individuals here. We're talking about the wide receivers as a group, and the
drop off considerably after Owens.
is their No. 2 receiver, while the
with Porter the deep threat. That group combined for 224 catches, 2,550 yards and 18 touchdowns. Owens, Streets and
had 204 receptions, 2,388 yards and 19 scores.
"Individually, you'd much rather have
," said our scout. "But, collectively, the
, Porter and Rice have size, speed and experience, with Porter a starter with Owens if he's on San Francisco."
Here's something that went overlooked last weekend: The
had more catches (8) and more yards (78) than All-Pro tight end
. A seventh-round pick in the 2001 draft, Johnson was a steal. But he's been bothered by back problems this year, reducing him to 36 catches.
was close with 32 catches and two scores, but combine him with
, and the
tandem is more effective as receivers and as blockers than Johnson and
. "I think Jolley's going to be a terrific player," said one personnel director. "I like Johnson, but the guy's been hurt. Jolley can run, has good hands is hard to tackle."
There aren't many coaches out there who do more than San Francisco's Pat Morris, one of the league's unheralded assistants. The
don't have high draft picks on their offensive line, yet each year the club is among the best running and protecting the quarterback. This year was no different, with their quarterbacks sacked 22 times and their rushing game the sixth best in the league. However, the
are loaded, with two All-Pros (Lincoln Kennedy and
) and no weak links on one of the biggest and baddest offensive lines in the NFL. I dare you to find me one better. "I think the
are vastly underrated," said an NFC scout. "But there's no one better than the
. The only clubs that give their offensive line trouble are the ones with speed, but they generally dominate up front. My only question is: If the
aren't that good here, how come
didn't make a play last weekend? They pay the guy $20 million to sign, and they couldn't get one pressure out of him." "It's not close," said another scout. "Everywhere you look the
are just better. You'd take Robbins over Newberry. Kennedy and (Barry) Sims are better than (Derrick) Deese and (Scott) Gragg. And I like their guards. This is a mismatch."
Our board was split here, liking San Francisco's defensive ends but preferring what Oakland has inside. Nevertheless, it was the
' ability to rush the passer with
that swung the vote. Oakland produced little pressure on the outside, but the
were solid with their tackles with
leading the club with 11 sacks. Coleman,
, but the
held the upper hand outside and that made the difference with our panel. "Okeafor and Carter were much better pressuring the pocket than anything the
got out of their ends," said our pro personnel director. "I give the
the nod because they're better on the edge."
Where is Katherine Harris when you need her? This one's too close to call, and there weren't even chads to misinterpret. The
had a marvelous season, but so did Oakland's
and San Francisco's Derrick Smith are close, too with Romanowski second only to Barton in team tackles, and Smith leading the
' fourth-leading tackler but had only one-half sack. The
had two and was the
' fifth-best tackler despite missing two games.
"It's a push," said one scout. "If I were to pick one, maybe I'd lean toward the
, but I think the two teams are even." So did everyone else.
The Verdict: Hung jury
Imagine if the
had rookie cornerback
. They'd have one of the best secondaries in the business. As it is, they're not all that bad without him ... with an All-Pro in safety
and a four-time Pro Bowl choice in cornerback
have been hurt, so they haven't been as effective -- or as visible -- lately. But they're more experienced and just plain better than the
helped themselves with
at safety, but Woodson had a better year leading the team in interceptions (8), fumble recoveries (3) and defensive scores (2). San Francisco safety
is a playmaker, but he missed most of the season. Oakland has the advantage at nickel back, too, with
the choice over rookie
. "Let's face it, the
have better quickness and better cover guys back there," said one scout. "I love them at the corners, and I'd rather have Woodson and (Derrick) Gibson at the safeties. Sure, Parrish played well, but nobody made more key plays at safety this year than
. I'd take him over anyone there."
went through two punters and two kickers, and that should give you a clue about their special teams: They struggled most of the year.
missed 10 of 36 field goals, while the team's punting average of 38.4 yards was among the league's lowest. There's nothing certain about Oakland's
either, especially on field goals outside the 40. And his 26-of-33 performance was down from last year. Still, he led the league with 22 touchbacks on kickoffs. Oakland punter
averaged 42.5 yards a kick, which isn't bad, but had a net of 32.7 yards, which is. It had him ranked 25th in the NFL, with a league-high 12 touchbacks. Still, the
were worse, with a 31.6 net. "This isn't really close, either," said our pro personnel director. "Both teams are struggling with their return games, but Oakland would be in a lot different shape if it had (Terry) Kirby or Buchanon. Still, I like the
' specialists, just because they're more experienced."
Senior writer Clark Judge covers the NFL for FOXSports.com and can be reached at his e-mail address:
More Stories From
JUDGE: NFC South full of title contenders
JUDGE: Five who could thrive
JUDGE: Unsigned stars of NFL Europe
Please Select a Sport
Sports & Pop Culture
BIG EAST HOOPS
I agree to
MORE ON YARDBARKER.COM »
Best Person in Sports: Keenan Lewis
Posted: Jul 15, 2014
Saints CB Keenan Lewis hosts a back-to-school event, giving children medical ser...
NFL Roundtable: New York Jets
Posted: Jul 14, 2014
They're a team with plenty to prove and a roster of players primed to get it don...
NFL Roundtable: Detroit Lions
Posted: Jul 11, 2014
A team with so many weapons, is this the season that the Lions put together and ...
MORE FOXSPORTS VIDEO »
NFL Insiders: Dolphins name Dennis Hickey new general manager
Carroll: Seahawks CB Richard Sherman sorry about postgame rant
Browns to interview Bills' Pettine with Broncos' Gase out of running
NFL talking to 49ers about sideline hit vs Seahawks in NFC title game
Falcons hire former Chiefs GM Pioli as assistant general manager
MORE NEWS »
More Than Sports on MSN
Young fan gets LeBron's headband, loses mind
Cavs big three put on show for Central Ohio
Real-game feel good news for Cavs in win
México deja dudas en el Azteca
Carlos Hermosillo se una a LUP
Panamá y Costa Rica firman 2-2
Spurs mount comeback, beat Dnipro
Juve bounce Trabzonspor from Europa
Shea, Onyewu return to USA squad
Former NFL QB still feels effects of concussi...
Robert Klemko given four-week suspension from...
Michael Vick: Percy Harvin won't be a monster...
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
New England Patriots
New Orleans Saints
New York Giants
New York Jets
St. Louis Rams
San Diego Chargers
San Francisco 49ers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
FOX Sports Supports
What If Sports
FOX Sports Radio
Other FOX Sites ›
21st Century Fox
FOX Sports Supports
Statistical Information provided by: STATS LLC
© 2014 Fox Sports Interactive Media, LLC. All rights reserved.