Len psyched to be coming to Phoenix, but draft analysts slightly less enthused about Suns' picks.
By FOX SPORTS ARIZONA FS Arizona
It's the day after the draft, and you know what that means: grades. Ridiculously early, entirely subjective grades, but grades nonetheless. Compiled below are the report cards from the prominent NBA analysts who have bothered to assemble them, and there's actually somewhat of a consensus on the
Suns' draft, which started with high-upside center Alex Len out of Maryland (at No. 5 overall) and also included guard
Archie Goodwin from Kentucky (No. 29 via trade) and forward Alex Oriakhi out of Missouri (No. 57).
Ford's full analysis remains behind a paywall, but his issue with the Suns' first pick seemed to be that, in his assessment, they passed on more talented players to take one with a lot of potential but little certainty.
"Len has upside, but he's coming off stress-fracture surgery, and in two years at Maryland he showed only flashes of greatness -- he rarely could sustain it. Len was the riskiest pick of the consensus top six, and Phoenix passed on two better prospects -- Noel and McLemore -- to take him."
Ford was slightly more favorable regarding the selection of Archie Goodwin at No. 29, saying the former Kentucky guard "could be special" if his jumper and understanding of the game can catch up to his athleticism.
Mannix, unlike Ford, seemed more optimistic about the Len pick than the Goodwin one. His analysis: "The Suns got a center of the future in Alex Len, whose presence could make the coveted
Marcin Gortat expendable. I thought Archie Goodwin at No. 29 was a reach; Goodwin has not shown me he can be an NBA three-point shooter and is on the small side for a 2-guard. Still, a lot of teams had him slotted in the lottery during the college season, when he struggled more than people expected."
From CBS Sports' Matt Moore: F, B+, B+ (picks graded individually)
Clearly, Moore is the outlier. While there's plenty of skepticism about Len's transition to the NBA, this is undoubtedly the most pessimistic analysis: "I'm probably being too harsh on him. But I look at his pick and roll, I look at his strength at the basket, and I look at his upside to what he can possibly be, and I don't see a dominant player." Considering that "a dominant player" is the expectation with a top-five pick, if that's his assessment, the grade is a fair one.
On the other hand, Moore is far more optimistic about Goodwin, giving that pick a B+ and saying, "I like this pick a lot. It gives the Suns a significant upgrade on the wing."
Moore's assessment of Oriakhi, the team's second-round pick, also came across as favorable: "High upside at his slot, could surprise with athleticism." Still, with the first-round pick obviously being the most prominent, it's unlikely that his overall grade (which he doesn't provide) would rise to the B- given by most other analysts.
Joseph didn't have any particularly strong takes; his assessment of all three picks could basically be summarized as "meh."
"Some draft experts called Len the best prospect available and a legitimate option at No. 1. Others said he wouldn't be a top-10 pick in most drafts (and) was doomed to be another 7-foot stiff. The Suns need a home run, particularly now with new management. They're counting on Len to become an elite defender and to develop his soft touch. Goodwin wasn't a reach but also wasn't the best shooting guard on the board. He could get a chance to start at a position of need. Oriakhi probably won't make the team but is tough and physical. The draft is underwhelming, but none of the picks were bad."